|
On 02/27/2014 11:20 PM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
On Feb 26, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Chris Murphy wrote:by default we put ext4 on LVMThe tool works in this use-case unless something has broken it recently.It can be done, the convert tool should work, and Btrfs should work on any device mapper instance. However… In the context of the default ext4+LVM layout the conversion still means separate /boot, /, and /home file systems. A major benefit of the Btrfs layout is these are subvolumes, which instead draw space from one volume pool. And that's lost with a conversion strategy. It also means going from a Fedora "standard" layout to a distinctly non-standard one because our Btrfs layout isn't like the result you'd get from what you're talking about. Chris Murphy A question I have, forgive me if it seems stupid, is why not just change the standard? From what I have seen is that btrfs is superior to ext4 as even Theodore T'so (creator of ext4) said btrfs "offers improvements in scalability, reliability, and ease of management". I feel that eventually other filesystems may show to be better than ext4 and we probably will need to change the standards for the sake of quality. My fear is that we will be sacrificing quality for not having too change much. |
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
