Re: default file system, was: Comparison to Workstation Technical Specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/01/2014 05:04 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
> 
> As you say they are 'plain' filesystems. Though I now regret not
> sending my small datapoint in before the Server WG decision. That's
> that a while ago, after using XFS for a long time we started putting
> new filesystems onto ext4 and in the past month we moved probably our
> largest remaining dataset (1.1TB) from XFS to ext4, the main reason
> has been flexibility with resizing. Particularly the XFS 32bit inode
> ceiling, (inode64 not working well with NFS).

Could you speak more to the inode64/NFS issue?


-- 
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux