On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Josh Boyer (jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >> > Basically, what I'm saying is that if Desktop would be OK with using >> > xfs-on-LVM as default with all choices demoted to custom partitioning >> > (no dropdown), as Server has currently agreed on, that'd be great. Or if >> > we could otherwise achieve agreement on something. >> >> I'll bring it up. I believe the momentum on using ext4-on-LVM is that >> it's the existing default, it's a known quantity, and we have the most >> experience with it as a project. > > So, we're combining momentum on using the existing default for a Fedora > deliverable and the existing default for a RHEL deliverable to get two > different defaults? Physics sucks huh? Isn't this what they call an elastic collision? That's the one where things collide and then go off in different directions, right? > (I'd note that RHEL Workstation, at least in the beta, defaults to XFS as > well, although I think that's merely inheriting from the Server cases.) Fair point. As I said, I'll bring it up. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
