2014-02-26 17:46 GMT+01:00 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:58 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:> That seems to be optimizing for bugs that break the boot, when bugsIt is optimizing for answering the most important question first, which
> that occur in less-frequently used parts of the system are far more
> common; a lot of software is not used, or not critical, in the boot
> path.
is: Can I tag this build / push this to the thousands of developers and
testers which be blocked from testing the less-frequently used parts of
the system if their system doesn't boot anymore after the upgrade.
Are you saying that the boot path should have tests, and the less-frequently used parts of the system should be verified by seeing whether any human users notice breakage? I don't think "if it boots, ship it" is an acceptable quality target.
Mirek
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
