On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Yeah, agreed here. Everyone wants the latest shiniest thing, even if that >> thing isn't ready. I really don't want to wade through tons of bug reports >> for btrfs just because it has a lot of hype. >> >> Also, right now cloud is plain old ext4. Let's see if we can ship *all* of >> the filesystems! It'll be fun! > > Yep, a lot of fun - three different file systems for free different products. > And we are back to the question how much these products could differ - with > limited resources we have right now - at least short term. Who can answer it > - filesystem/kernel guys, if they are able and willing to support all I'm a kernel guy. We already ship all of these filesystems. People already do installs with all of them. Really, it's more about what we consider _sane_ as the default for most users that don't know the difference, and not about shipping them in general. > potential filesystem, as David stated, it's possible in Anaconda but again > the same question if the team would be able to maintain more filesystems > support with high bar in terms of quality (even for example brtfs limited > to bare minimum), QA... And it could be pretty confusing for users but that's I don't think the support aspect is going to change much either way. The only thing I see possibly happening is more focus on btrfs, but I know my team isn't in a position to spend any significant amount of time on that right now. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
