On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:18:12AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Yeah, agreed here. Everyone wants the latest shiniest thing, even if that > > thing isn't ready. I really don't want to wade through tons of bug reports > > for btrfs just because it has a lot of hype. > > > > Also, right now cloud is plain old ext4. Let's see if we can ship *all* of > > the filesystems! It'll be fun! > > Yep, a lot of fun - three different file systems for free different products. > And we are back to the question how much these products could differ - with > limited resources we have right now - at least short term. Who can answer it > - filesystem/kernel guys, if they are able and willing to support all > potential filesystem, as David stated, it's possible in Anaconda but again > the same question if the team would be able to maintain more filesystems > support with high bar in terms of quality (even for example brtfs limited > to bare minimum), QA... And it could be pretty confusing for users but that's > up to us/marketing to explain that products aim specific goal and it's for > good (if we would be able to support it - then it's for good, if not...). I think filesystem variance across different Fedoras really impacts QA more than us. We already support a lot of filesystems, but the real hit is the QA test matrix. > Adding devel list to CC - I expect another topic Base should be involved > too. > > And no, no elections for file system. It's really up to WGs and coordination > with the rest teams. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Manager, Installer Engineering Team Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
