On 2/24/14, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christopher, Harald's going overboard with his emphasis as usual, but he > is correct that you should take extra care when giving karma if you > don't get the update from the updates-testing repository. In future, > please do be careful to check if the updates are internally dependency > consistent before giving karma. > > It is incorrect to split an update from another update on which it > depends, as happened in this case. As LO requires libcmis, they should > be bundled together. If you knew LO required the updated libcmis, it > wasn't correct to up-karma the LO update when it did not include the > updated libcmis. Will do. Actually last weekend I saw the libreoffice update and tested it with dep from koji by hand, I thought that the maintainer would push libcmis as update so I just left the kerma for libreoffice here. I think he also should submit them in one update next time. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
