Adam Williamson wrote: > Very much +1. Putting it in kickstarts is a worse tying problem than > putting it in a package: it ties this configuration mechanism to a > system for creating deliverables, which is what kickstart is. We need to > be moving away from having configuration in kickstarts, not adding more. I can only echo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739446#c3 (which was about the /etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys script mentioned by Matthias Clasen): | I actually like the ks files being more self contained, though they do | depend on some base ks files. I think it makes it a bit easier to | customize stuff when all you might want to change is in one place. As one of the comaintainers of the KDE live kickstart, I think it would be nice to have one place that defines all the properties of the spin, and the presets are part of that, especially once we accept spin-specific presets. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
