On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:40:52AM -0500, John.Florian@xxxxxxxx wrote: > I too would much prefer this approach. For somebody like me who wants to > maintain company-private packages based on django, this affords more > flexibility. I realize it may always mean more packaging work to keep > several python-djangoXYs in the distro, but it makes for a less rigid > coupling between the OS and what framework version you need to use. The issue with this approach is, there is no upgrade, i.e. if your fantasticApp-1.0 uses python-django15 and fantasticApp-1.1 requires python-django16, you'd still have the older Django installed, which will produce a conflict. Thus the upgrade will fail. -- Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
