Re: OpenCASCADE and applications depending on it

Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> · Sun, 16 Feb 2014 16:58:19 +0100



    On 16.02.2014 14:56, Richard Shaw
      wrote:

    
          [snip]
            

            I wonder if we could do a staged review instead, for
              instance, have a review request just for the kernel, then
              create a separate review request for smesh but make the
              kernel review request a blocker for it. I think this would
              break the reviews into manageable chucks but preserve the
              source as is while making sure each module gets reviewed.
              Otherwise we would have to get all of them reviewed at one
              time.
            

            The main difference from the traditional review would
              be we would not need a SCM request after the first, we
              would just be getting the OK that the module was good and
              met the guidelines.
          
        
    So basically in the end you would merge the spec files together into
    one big thing? Or possibly have one master spec with many small
    specs which are included with %include ?

    
                      I didn't need the omniORB
                        patch but I did have to do a quick package of
                        omniORBpy which is under review:
                      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=783064

                      
                Oh right, I see I also have a omniORBpy src.rpm in my
                work-in-progress folder, I guess I also hit that
                dependency down the road. Your review seems stalled, if
                you want I can take over.
            
            
            Up to you, it's not my review I just happened to find
              it while checking for current review requests before
              submitting my own.
            

    I've commented in BZ.

    
              [snip]
            
            
            Of course I'd like to see the whole thing in Fedora but
              my immediate need is for smesh. I've got an open review
              for OpenCascade community edition already going and need
              both for FreeCAD, which currently bundles smesh. 
            

            If we can get a RR going for the kernel and smesh (does
              smesh have any other dependencies?)
          
        
    From my work-in-progess spec, I see

    %package smesh

    Summary: The Salome smesh (meshing) module

    Requires: salome-gui%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

    Requires: salome-geom%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

    Requires: salome-med%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

    
    So the roadmap is basically to get python-omniORB and OCE in fedora,
    and then we can start moving with salome-kernel and the rest.

    
    Thanks,

    Sandro

    
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct