Re: Auto-expiring bugs are getting absurd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 08:48 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 23:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 13:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Where is the human to notice "comments after EOL" and act accordingly?
> 
> In practice, GNOME maintainers have hundreds of bugs apiece and so
> rarely respond to individual bug reports, even simple requests to close
> or reopen a bug.
> 
> Also many GNOME bugs are assigned to the Red Hat email address of
> somebody who I believe no longer works at Red Hat

There's supposed to be a process for this, I've seen it happen multiple
times when someone leaves. Their manager is expected to have their BZ
account closed and the bugs re-assigned, I believe. So: if you know who
that person's manager was...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux