Re: Auto-expiring bugs are getting absurd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:59:46 +0000
Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 05/02/14 22:57, Tom Hughes wrote:
> 
> > TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to
> > update the version if they wanted it to stay open so I'm a bit
> > surprised to hear that they can't unless they are also a packager.
> 
> In fact the first message actually tells the reporter to do that:
> 
> : Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not
> : be able to fix it before Fedora 18 is end of life. If you would
> still : like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it
> against a : later version  of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the
> 'version' to : a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 18's end of
> life.
> 
> so if they can't do so then that message seems a little suboptimal.

This person was not the reporter. 

They simply added that they saw it also in f19. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux