On 05/02/14 22:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
The problem is that no-one seems to come up with an alternative that's any better. Leaving bugs on EOL versions open to rot away and be ignored is no use. We *could* give everyone privs to re-open closed bugs, I guess, and I personally don't think that would end terribly, but it's kind of a radical plan.
What about allowing the reporter to update the version and/or reopen it if it does get closed? or is BZ not able to offer that as an option?
TBH I thought the whole point was that the reporter was expected to update the version if they wanted it to stay open so I'm a bit surprised to hear that they can't unless they are also a packager.
Tom -- Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
