Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 14:34 +0100, Lukáš Tinkl wrote:

> Fedora isn't a Gnome OS, perhaps that's what they're trying to convey; 
> making it one will most probably create less confusion but I'm sure it 
> will also make us less relevant (my personal opinion).

Not sure why that was necessary, but I'll answer anyway:

I would be happy if Fedora moves towards being an OS, with a clear
separation between system and applications, and a clear definition of
what is part of the core system and what isn't. I don't think it makes
sense to discuss products if we don't agree on that as a necessity. 

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux