Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:39:03 -0600
Jon <jdisnard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Another aspect I worry about is the mirroring stuff.
> With the coming WGs I fear the rsync mirroring will grow very large,
> and spins are an attractive piece of fat to cut.
> Reducing size is something we worry about on the infra, rel-eng side
> of things.

If numbers of Gnome > || < non Gnome Desktops 
//* am not including DEs' as Spins */
if less than, do such students\devs\admins move from Fedora usage
as Fedora.next has nothing for them.
Is not the whole purpose of .next to prevent losing users.

If storage is the problem, cull all
Fedora EOL 3+ year releases\rpms etc.
Move spins when created to Linux tracker etc..

Or is it all an Exercise to limit Fedora to Gnome only?

___
Regards,
Frank 
www.frankly3d.com

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux