On 01/29/2014 09:33 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:03 PM, inode0 <inode0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:57 PM, H. Guémar <hguemar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal process to
accept new products.
Something like => proposal => crop (aka product-to-be) => validation =>
product
When we'll have that, drop the whole spin thing, any spin that isn't fit to
be a product should be reclassified as remix.
Why do we expect spins to be any more official products than they are now?
I can't really imagine this ever working. Do you imagine a day where
Fedora has 20, 30, 50 official products? I don't.
I'd rather not confuse what is made from Fedora bits with what is
based on Fedora bits but includes other bits. The remix branding does
not seem appropriate for spins that are made purely from Fedora bits.
That's fair. From a resource and quality perspective though, I'd
rather not burden rel-eng and QA with having to maintain, create, and
test spins.
You do realize that you are faced with exact same problem as are with
spins with " wg product(s)" and the resolution is the same.
The sub-community producing it will have to put up the QA resources to
manage and test whatever is put on top of core/base and I would think
the same applies from releng perspective.
To put this differently as I see it both communities QA and Releng only
serve as overseers and guiding forces but wont put *any* resources
themselves into spins nor wg product(s) since those resources will have
to come from the sub communities producing spins or wg product(s).
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
