-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/2014 03:57 PM, H. Guémar wrote: > Hi, > > I think we should keep spins as long as we don't have a formal > process to accept new products. Something like => proposal => crop > (aka product-to-be) => validation => product When we'll have that, > drop the whole spin thing, any spin that isn't fit to be a product > should be reclassified as remix. > > btw, it wouldn't be wise to define that process while we're still > in Fedora.Next early stages, it'll just had more entropy. First we > should work to release our sample products, then use that > experience to define the process to bring a new product. > Well, one of the things we need to decide is whether we address Spins at all during the F21 timeframe. I suspect that QA will ask for a reprieve on that score. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLpbIwACgkQeiVVYja6o6NAOwCfeqNOwmikrZgS2uuVYbSSGmY2 bgAAoKDiszJp7pvgIv8Yn7gBf6Ryu21W =YCP4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
