On Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:29:12 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-23627 > > Karma: 17 > > Stable karma: 16 (!) > > > > It has reached the karma threshold 16 after ~5 days. > > And those have not been all testers. > > That can work for yum, but if I set the stable karma to 16 for kfloppy, Nobody suggested doing that for kfloppy or other packages, which hardly ever get feedback in bodhi. If a test update doesn't get any feedback in bodhi, what does that imply? If you mark it stable after 7 days, you've tested it yourself for some days, correct? If the update doesn't refer to any bugzilla tickets, what does that mean? > the > release will reach its EOL without it getting there (unless somebody targets > testers specifically at kfloppy to win the bet ;-) … and buys them floppy > drives, too ;-) ). Heck, even if Fedora releases didn't have an EOL, you or > me probably wouldn't live to see it go stable. Almost funny, if it weren't possible to mark test updates as stable after 7 days. It could be that nobody uses the package at all, so it would not a big deal if an update (or upgrade?) took 7+ days to enter the updates repo. ;-p -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
