Adam Williamson wrote:
> Yup, indeed. Of course, this is another area where we could improve the
> tooling: it doesn't seem like it'd be difficult for maintainers to be
> allowed to set a minimum timeframe before their update goes stable, but
> at present this isn't possible.
Why do we need to keep polishing that karma turd instead of just flushing it
away? Especially "karma automatism" is totally broken by design.
> Again, hate to sound like a broken record, but it's just hard to get
> enthusiastic about trying to twiddle the edges of the process when the
> process is fundamentally inadequate.
Oh yes, it is! So let's do away with it!
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
