Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 22:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> Good point. Raises the question why an update that links so many bugzilla
> tickets can be marked stable automatically after a +3, which may be even
> about a single bz ticket.

Because that's how the maintainer configured it. (It is also the default
configuration, of course, but no-one is obliged to accept the default
configuration).

In Fedora we effectively define a *baseline* requirement for updates of
various types to go from testing to stable, and beyond that, we grant to
maintainers the power to choose the policy that will apply to their
updates (and, therefore, the responsibility to choose wisely).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux