Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>  From the BlueZ 5.0 release notes:
> 
> "Remove internal support for telephony (HFP and HSP) profiles. They
> should be implemented using the new Profile interface preferably by the
> telephony subsystem of choice (e.g. oFono which already supports this)"
> 
> For Fedora this means PulseAudio.

This is a recurring problem in Fedora: Developers of software X think that 
feature Z is better done in software Y and happily remove Z from X, often 
without even talking to the developers of Y, and always without waiting for 
Y to actually implement the feature. In some cases, it is not even clear 
whether Z can be implemented properly (i.e., to the extent it was in X) in 
Y, I don't know whether that's the case here or whether it's just a matter 
of time.

Features MUST NOT get removed without a working replacement!

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux