On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:56 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > >> > As a side note, it also needs to be discussed how such a key feature of >> > the bluetooth stack could go unnoticed through QA, and how to avoid this >> > from happening again. >> >> Indeed. I wondered the same myself. > > I'm somewhat cheered that our product has apparently reached the quality > level where people consider a Bluetooth audio profile to be a 'key > feature', but so far as our QA standards are concerned, it ain't. > > This didn't really 'pass unnoticed' through QA. I noticed it, and was > supremely unconcerned. We should stop this "its crap anyway" attitude. That's the reason why people perceive fedora as beta / unstable / breaks often etc. Did you at least file a bug? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
