Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 01:35 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Sérgio Basto  wrote:
>         yeah , so revoke an update could be a better idea.
> 
> 
> How would that work? We don't control the mirrors.  Mirrors can choose
> to sync anytime they want to and retain packages we have removed. 

Even if we can do it on the mirrors, we have no way to 'recall' a
package from systems where it's already been installed (of course in the
current case that wouldn't have worked anyway, but we're discussing the
generic case here).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux