Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said: > This shows that people have not learned ANYTHING from the ButtKeeper fiasco. > :-( I think there's a big difference between that and Github. AFAIK Github isn't trying to claim ownership of all data and metadata related to hosted projects, or restrict who can use the tools, see the data, etc. And after all, that situation did give rise to git. Imagine if Github turned restrictive somehow, maybe someone would go and invent something even cooler to produce a whole new world of stuff! :) Seriously though, I don't see a problem with Github. It is SourceForge 2.0 as far as I can tell, and I'm sure something will come along eventually and replace it as the "new hotness". I can see putting projects that even might have some non-Fedora interest on non-Fedora-hosted platforms, if only to try to attract other interest. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
