On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 17:02 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 00:41:52 +0400 > Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 2014/1/23 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > Can you please file a infrastructure ticket on this and I will get > > > it updated. > > > > Don't know what others think, but I personally prefer GitHub pull > > requests because they are much simpler and don't involve any > > interaction with stone age software like trac or various MTAs. Just > > out of the curiosity why don't we mirror anything related to > > Fedora-Infra at GitHub? We actually have a working Fedora-Infra > > organisation here: > > > > https://github.com/fedora-infra > > While github is nice for pulls and patches, it's not so great for > tickets and support needs. And you can, of course, just mail patches to mailing lists. That's what git was designed for in the first place, and it appears to work perfectly well for kernel and anaconda devs... (though the github workflow works fine too, and I've been using it quite a lot lately). has anyone yet publicly noted the irony of someone building a wildly successful proprietary SCM platform on top of a project that was written to rescue the kernel from a proprietary SCM platform, btw? :P -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
