Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 21:35 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>
>> Right. But is it possible to ship a bluez4 package and rebuild the
>> dependencies against that after the release?
>
> How does that differ, in practice?

Potentially,

- No epoch bump.
- Packages which really need bluez-5, can continue to use it
- No rebuild needed for packages which do not rely on the missing functionality

That said, I am not sure which of the above would apply to the current
situation. That's why I asked.

Best,
Orcan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux