Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 21:35 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > David Sommerseth wrote:
> >> So, I wonder if it can be considered to enable a "downgrade path" for
> >> bluez and depending packages, as described in the "Contingency Plan":
> >> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5>
> >
> > Officially downgrading BlueZ from 5 to 4 in a shipped release is totally
> > impractical. It just cannot be done realistically. (Contingency plans are
> > only intended to be enacted BEFORE the release.)
> 
> Right. But is it possible to ship a bluez4 package and rebuild the
> dependencies against that after the release?

How does that differ, in practice?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux