On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:03 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi! > > On 03.01.2014 19:14, Matthew Miller wrote: >> […] So those are my things. What do you think about them? What >> else should be included? What different directions should we >> consider? How will we make Fedora more awesome than ever in the >> coming year? > > Okay, I'll bite (after thinking whether writing this mail is worth it): > > I'm still undecided if I overall like Fedora.next or fear it. But more > and more I tend to the latter position and wonder if it might be wise > to slow things down: Do one more Fedora release the old style in round > about June; that would give us more time to better discuss and work > out Fedora.next and get contributors involved better in the planing. Actually this makes sense we are currently do not even have a schedule because to many stuff is just undefined. Maybe this should be a formal proposal for FESCo to consider. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
