On 01/23/2014 06:09 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I don't agree with the premise at all and therefore unsurprising I don't agree with this conclusion. In any case, I sincerely doubt you will get even a single person other than yourself to agree with this proposal but feel free to try filing a ticket with the QA team.
Oh I see you apparently have no idea what we in the QA community do but since you dont we dont handle this matters so there is no point for me to file a ticket it would not lead anywhere , however FESCO does and last time I knew they where trying to deal with this effectively with infra ( I have filed ticket about this before as have others ) but as you can see they are not doing very god job of dealing with it ( last result lead to them trying to find co-maintainers before removing a package as you have proposed but as you can see it has lead nowhere ) And this is a manually run process ( which Bill usually runs I think ) which they have in place which must have fallen through the cracks due the whole .next or wg stuff. ( which is not surprising )
JBG -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
