Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 01/23/2014 03:55 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >So, one possibility would be to move less-maintained packages to a separate
> >repository tree still included as Fedora and enabled by default
>That wont reduce the bugs reported against it...
That's not necessarily bad. And by categorizing those bugs separately, it
would be easier to treat them differently.

We dont want QA community members testers/reporters/triagers ( and general end users ) wasting their contributed time reporting bugs that wont get fixed.
( I assume infra/releng dont want to spent resources in those either )

Or to put this differently if the WG's expect QA to spend *any* resources in the output they deliver, we in QA need to free up contributed time time in the QA community to do so and one way to achive that is for us to plug resources leakage like this one.

So do you want us being able to help you with your cloud effort or do you want us to waste time on dead components?

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux