On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:01:24PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 17:00 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 15:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:28AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > I'd suggest this test should be a high priority for implementation once > > > > taskotron is operational, perhaps equal in importance to re-implementing > > > > the current AutoQA tests. > > > > > > *nod* Sounds good to me. > > > > > > > > > > what we have. I don't know how to quantify that point, though. All's I > > > > can do is reiterate that yes, this is a really significant pain point in > > > > our current processes, the proposed Bodhi 2.0 design would make things > > > > almost immeasurably better, and plead with anyone reading this who has > > > > the power to bump up the importance of / resources assigned to Bodhi > > > > 2.0's development to do so. > > > > > > So many things at top priority. :) I know Luke Macken is actually actively > > > working it. > > > > I know he is. He's been actively working on it for the said three-four > > year period. Every FUDCon/Flock he tells me it's nearly done. ;) > > > > Not ragging Luke, but it rather seems like we need about six more of Unfortunately, bodhi has not had dedicated full-time development resources in a long time. Thankfully, I now have the cycles to put into new features, such as improving the feedback mechanisms. Many components of the "Bodhi 2.0" vision are long-term, and rely on a plethora of other pieces to fall into place, such as python-fedora+fas-openid, koji+mash, taskotron, depcheck-mk-2, and so on. Other pieces of the puzzle can be implemented and deployed incrementally within the current tools now. My focus lately has been around the releng/infra side of the updates process, but for a feature that would make things 'immeasurably better' (even though I think it would actually be measurable :P), I'd be happy to shift gears to the QA/frontend side of things to help get it done sooner rather than later. As far as I can tell, you sent some ideas to a mailing list a few years ago about it, and then Mathieu started a prototype. I can't find any RFEs filed for it, so I'll create one and see what I can do about getting the existing prototype polished and integrated for testing. luke -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
