On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 15:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:48:28AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'd suggest this test should be a high priority for implementation once > > taskotron is operational, perhaps equal in importance to re-implementing > > the current AutoQA tests. > > *nod* Sounds good to me. > > > > what we have. I don't know how to quantify that point, though. All's I > > can do is reiterate that yes, this is a really significant pain point in > > our current processes, the proposed Bodhi 2.0 design would make things > > almost immeasurably better, and plead with anyone reading this who has > > the power to bump up the importance of / resources assigned to Bodhi > > 2.0's development to do so. > > So many things at top priority. :) I know Luke Macken is actually actively > working it. I know he is. He's been actively working on it for the said three-four year period. Every FUDCon/Flock he tells me it's nearly done. ;) Not ragging Luke, but it rather seems like we need about six more of him. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
