-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/20/2014 10:50 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 08:42 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:02:24 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: >> >>>> Anyone not aware of the problem and the fix, who applies the >>>> -117.fc20 selinux-policy update in _enforcing_ mode (since it has >>>> entered stable updates meanwhile) believing it to be a normal update, >>>> will face another failure and a partial update. Package >>>> selinux-policy updated to -117.fc20 but -targeted remaining at >>>> -116.fc20. >>> >>> I don't see this. I just updated today before reading this message (and >>> I haven;t read the whole thread, sorry) and I got selinux-policy and >>> targeted updated without any problem (I always run in enforcing mode). >> >> Did you update from -116.fc20 or an earlier one? >> >> Only if you come from -116.fc20, you would be affected, since -116.fc20 >> is the bad update. > > Ah I think I skipped 116, sorry for the noise. > > Simo. > Lucky man, hopefully a lot of users skipped it... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLdXA4ACgkQrlYvE4MpobObvwCgrvA8ndAn5zBUpWA/LvO3fCUw qKUAoLHkon72qLTudvb/5LsHguzzt8Rg =8cRf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
