On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 08:42 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:02:24 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > Anyone not aware of the problem and the fix, who applies the -117.fc20 > > > selinux-policy update in _enforcing_ mode (since it has entered stable > > > updates meanwhile) believing it to be a normal update, will face another > > > failure and a partial update. Package selinux-policy updated > > > to -117.fc20 but -targeted remaining at -116.fc20. > > > > I don't see this. > > I just updated today before reading this message (and I haven;t read the > > whole thread, sorry) and I got selinux-policy and targeted updated > > without any problem (I always run in enforcing mode). > > Did you update from -116.fc20 or an earlier one? > > Only if you come from -116.fc20, you would be affected, since -116.fc20 is > the bad update. Ah I think I skipped 116, sorry for the noise. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
