On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:10 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 07:38 -0700, Ken Dreyer wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Richard Shaw > <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I noticed that EPEL 7 branches were created for several of > my packages that > > > have el6 branches, but not all of them. I didn't request > them (yet) so I'm > > > wondering, are some packages automatically added or did > someone else request > > > them as a dependency to one of their packages? I need to > dig through my > > > packages but I intend to maintain el7 branches of all of > my packages that > > > have el6 branches. > > > > It's possible that these were some of the packages that you > and I > > share as dependencies of MythTV. I requested branches for a > lot of my > > packages on January 11th using Dennis' procedure with the > wiki [1], > > but I haven't gotten around to doing the builds in Koji yet. > I'm > > planning to do the builds by next week. > > > I would've expected anything that exists in epel6 and doesn't > exist in > rhel7 to get an epel7 branch. It seems a bit ludicrous doing > it manually > - do I have to go through all the deps of any package I want > to build > for epel7 and figure this out manually and file branch > requests for each > package that isn't in rhel7? yeesh. > > Agreed... The only argument I can think of against it is that we don't > want stuff that's not being maintained from automatically making it's > way into el7 Well, things don't get *built* just because they have a git branch. I don't think we usually do mass builds in epel, do we? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
