Dne 15.1.2014 17:51, Dridi Boukelmoune napsal(a): > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Dne 14.1.2014 21:41, Andrew Lutomirski napsal(a): >>> I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain. >>> These cleanups are trivial enough that I don't think they're worth a >>> new build. Should I commit them to the master branch? If so, I can >>> imagine a couple of issues: >>> >>> - A provenpackager could kick off a rebuild for whatever reason (e.g. >>> dependency soname bump). That will (I think) inadvertently include my >>> changes. >>> - I need to think about whether to add a changelog entry or not. If >>> not, those changes might be included silently. If yes, then I need to >>> think about what to do about the revision number. >>> >>> The normal GIT approach would be to develop on another branch and to >>> merge when I want to build a new revision (the Fedora equivalent of >>> tagging a new release). Should Fedora provide branches like >>> master-devel, f20-devel, etc that store pending changes? >>> >>> Am I missing something really obvious here? >>> >>> --Andy >> Actually I'd really love to see some possibility for private branches. >> Now, it is possible to push whatever branch (take it literally) you have >> in your local git repo into dist-git, but there is no way how to delete >> it by myself. >> >> For example, I am using branches to keep my .spec file aligned with >> upstream development and I'd like to share it with other maintainers. >> But this .spec file should never build in Rawhide unless it is approved >> by FESCo. >> >> Could you please add support for private branches? I.e. the branch which >> starts by private- prefix could be pushed and deleted as well, non ff >> commit should be allowed. Actually, better would be if only master, fxx >> and elx are protected and others are unrestricted, but I am probably >> asking too much. > For private branches I'd rather see something along fas/branch. > > With the '/' separator you can glob refspecs, and using your fas as a > prefix could enable automatic acls with less pain on the > infrastructure side (eg. allow anyone to manage and own private > branches at will). > > Dridi Yes, that is a good idea, why not? Anything would help :) Vít -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
