I have some trivial cleanups I want to make to a package a maintain. These cleanups are trivial enough that I don't think they're worth a new build. Should I commit them to the master branch? If so, I can imagine a couple of issues: - A provenpackager could kick off a rebuild for whatever reason (e.g. dependency soname bump). That will (I think) inadvertently include my changes. - I need to think about whether to add a changelog entry or not. If not, those changes might be included silently. If yes, then I need to think about what to do about the revision number. The normal GIT approach would be to develop on another branch and to merge when I want to build a new revision (the Fedora equivalent of tagging a new release). Should Fedora provide branches like master-devel, f20-devel, etc that store pending changes? Am I missing something really obvious here? --Andy -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
