Re: How to get packager sponsorship

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/12/2014 10:29 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Some thoughts:
> 
>   http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html
>   http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
> 
>   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
> 
> There is a growing number of people in the NEEDSPONSOR queue, who have
> submitted a single package only and who don't attempt at doing a review of
> a different package in the various queues (not even a review of the own
> package).
> 
> Many packager sponsors consider that a problem. I'm not the spokesperson
> of all packager sponsors, though. ;)
> 
Yes, I share this concern. Doing informal reviews is a significant part
of getting sponsored. I'd expect packagers to review their own review
requests (just to be sure, the first review doesn't fail for quite
obvious reasons).

Matthias
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux