Hi,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Jochen Schmitt <Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:29:54AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:Review your own package?
> There is a growing number of people in the NEEDSPONSOR queue, who have
> submitted a single package only and who don't attempt at doing a review of
> a different package in the various queues (not even a review of the own
> package).
New contributors can also review their own package and show what things they found in their package like how they found they have correct upstream source matching checksum, how they found license tag for their package, what rpmlint output they found etc. This applies even for other packages also waiting for review. But, here what Michael want to point out that people waiting for their package review who are also waiting for sponsorship should at least look into http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html and provide their review findings so that other people will come to know any issues in their package and they can be updated/progressed further.
I think the aim of the review process is, that a second one should have
a look on your package to verify, that your package mmets the package
guidelines and so on.
For a new contributor, if he submitted many packages then whichever package first gets reviewed should get approved by sponsor member.
Most people may be blind against thier onw mistakes, so it makes sense
that anonther one take a look on the package which should introduced
to Fedora.
Regards,
Parag
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
