RE: dnf versus yum

[SHERESSA HILL <sheressa@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

---

Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:36:11 -0800
Subject: Re: dnf versus yum
From: richard.vickeryrv@xxxxxxxxx
To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:28 PM, yersinia <yersinia.spiros@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>5 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02.01.2014 20:36, Steve Clark wrote:
>
>> Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as opposed to being some
>> nonsensical conglomeration of letters. The only thing I am aware of that dnf means is "did not finish".
>
> Did Not Finish
> Do Not Forget
> Does Not Follow
> Data Not Found
> Did Not Find
> Does Not Function
> Do Not Freeze
> Do Not Fix
> Do Not Fax
> Do Not Forward
>
>
> poma

I do not think it is nice to speak so bad about a project. The
objective are clear,if something can be improved everyone can or  must
contribute.The criticisms are useless.We are talking about open source
software, do not forget.  I agree

Best regards
>

On the contrary: speaking negatively about a project may be fine so long as the context is clearly about such project, as it is only the project that is being harshly criticised. Where a problem often occurs is  when such criticism crosses over into affecting an individual.

-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct