Re: mechanism to retain system library versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey thanks!  But did you forget to include a link to the git repos?

Martin Langhoff wrote:

> Neal,
> 
> look like you've found the one thing fedora devel has consensus on ;-)
> 
> Here is a series of git repos that show how I was maintaining some
> rpms outside of the fedora infra, but using fedpkg (which I recommend)
> -- more specifically mockbuild.
> 
> These repos are public, but you can do the same in private git repos.
> 
> Given a bit of familiarity with spec files and git, this should be easy.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> m
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>>> How do others solve this problem
>>
>> package your software as rpms too, so such dependencies get tracked.
>>
>> -- Rex
>>
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
> 
> 
> 


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux