Lars Seipel wrote:
> Uhm. Exactly because I don't like my stuff breaking every three weeks I
> choose libraries that live up to my expectation. This might involve
> assessing the capability of an particular upstream to maintain their
> stuff going into the future or just avoiding the "latest flavored
> language of the day".
+1
You can, for example, use C++, which is a stable standard (a new version was
published 2 years ago, but almost all C++98 code compiles unchanged as
C++11), and Qt, which keeps a stable API and ABI throughout a major version
(the interval between the last 2 major versions having been over 7 years),
and we keep old major versions available in a clean way.
And the GNOME people would probably recommend their C + g* stack which
satisfies similar compatibility properties.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
