Re: Should a working fedup in Fedora N's stable repository be a release criterion for N+1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 18:33 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> I don't think Fedora is doing its users any favors by declaring F20 to
> be released when upgrading from F19 using 'fedup --source network 20'
> is known to be broken.  The bleeding-edge types can already upgrade to
> the beta.

I'm attempting to imagine Microsoft or Apple telling users to install an
experimental, insufficiently-tested utility to perform a risky operating
system upgrade -- or even a stable, sufficiently-tested utility that is
nonetheless labeled as experimental.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux