Re: [Base] Proposal for buildrequires cleanup janitorial initiative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 15.12.2013 11:55, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:57:00AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
* It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit
BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds them back as they are
required. This could reveal some BR which are actually not needed
anymore, but are listed among BR from historic reasons.
This is kind of hard to do without extensive functional tests, because it
may be that a BR was added because the build completes happily without it
but misses the related functionality. (This is pretty common, I think.)
auto-buildrequires (http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/auto-buildrequires/)
uses an LD_PRELOAD hack to find out what BuildRequires are packages
are actually touched during the build.  Therefore it does not suffer
from this problem.

Rich.


Unfortunately, there are some BR which are needed to pass the test suite, there are also other languages, which does not produce ELF files .... So it might help, but it does not solve everything.


Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux