On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > * It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit > BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds them back as they are > required. This could reveal some BR which are actually not needed > anymore, but are listed among BR from historic reasons. This is kind of hard to do without extensive functional tests, because it may be that a BR was added because the build completes happily without it but misses the related functionality. (This is pretty common, I think.) > * Second level could be to try to limit the BR, although some > extended functionality or binding might not be supported. This > extended functionality or bindings could be moved out into separate > package, although it would require second build run. Looking into > Python BR, I believe they could be trimmed down using this approach. That's an interesting idea. That'd take some big changes to the build process and at least to the packaging guidelines if not RPM itself. If making the base self-hosting is decided to be crucial, it might be worth the effort. (As opposed to the alternative approach of having a set of "Not in Base But Needed to Build It" packages.) -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project Architect -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
