On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 06:31:56PM -0500, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 22:12:09 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > TBH I don't think that's necessarily a bug. As long as B-devel > > Requires C-devel, and if A isn't directly including headers from > > C-devel, it seems fine for A not to BuildRequire C-devel. > > I was getting at C-devel being a BR is a bug, so we agree here, but it > looks like a-br just lists things without a rationale. I don't know how > fancy you could get, but maybe tracking open/close recursively to see > what is included where would work? Patches welcome. It's only 905 lines of code. In the original case in this thread, we're interested in the case where a BR is declared in the spec file but auto-buildrequires doesn't show that BR. This would be evidence that the BR is not needed and should be deleted, or at least carefully examined. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
