Re: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:56:47AM -0500, Will Benton wrote:
> Sorry for any confusion, Jochen.  The next step in the process is notifying fedora-devel, which it appears we're doing now.
> 
> Jochen, would your preferred resolution be to be the primary maintainer (with one or more co-maintainers)?

No, I was confused because I saw no action and I have tried to contact you via mail.
But I'm assume that this mail was going into your spam filter.

If you are going forward in the process, I will prefered the role of a co-maintainer of the
scala package.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux