Sorry for any confusion, Jochen. The next step in the process is notifying fedora-devel, which it appears we're doing now. Jochen, would your preferred resolution be to be the primary maintainer (with one or more co-maintainers)? best, wb ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jochen Schmitt" <Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 6:32:01 AM > Subject: None-responsive Maintainer of the scala package > > Hello, > > We have an open bug [1] becouse the primary mantainer of the scala > package shows no response for open bugs. > > Unfortunately, the original bug reporter seems to lost the inerest > to finish the none-responsive maintainer process. > > So I would like to ask, if it ok to reassign the bug to myself without > start the whole none-responsive process at the beginnning. > > Best Regards: > > Jochen Schmitt > > [1} orry fo > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
