Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:08:22PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:18 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> 
> > And what purpose does abrt serve if there aren't people fixing the issue 
> > it reports on the other end...
> 
> Well, that's easy enough to shoot down.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=CLOSED&classification=Fedora&limit=0&list_id=1982726&order=bug_id%20DESC&query_format=advanced&resolution=ERRATA&short_desc=[abrt]&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr
> 
> 4,230 bugs with [abrt] in the summary have been closed as ERRATA since
> abrt was introduced. That's not nothing.
I can confirm that abrt reports have proven fruitful for systemd: quite
a few crashes is special corner cases were caught and solved this way.
Abrt reports contains full tracebacks *and* open-files lists, which can
be great help.

Zbyszek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux