On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:01:07PM -0500, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > What about un-retirement? It is critical that administrators be able > to handle this side of the packaging process, even after a release has > been branched. This is out-of-scope for my proposal, except that no packages should be retired automatically after they were unretired. > Ideally, if that could be just as fast. I would suggest triggering > this on the _removal_ of the dead.package file in git, which perhaps > would require proven-packager authority vs simply package ownership. > > This would make it a lightweigth process to handle resurrection of > oprhaned and retired package or in case an error occurs. This would be > especially useful if a large number of packages were accidentally > retired. Unretirement requires manual inspection, because a re-review might be required. Also it happens less often than retirement and it is easily possible to retire a large amount of packages by administrative users if required. Therefore I do not see the need for improvements. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
